[OE-core] [PATCH 24/53] directfb: Fix build with musl

[Burton, Ross]

On 9 January 2016 at 03:27, Andre McCurdy <armccurdy at gmail.com> wrote:

> For patches which fix 'correctness' issues uncovered by musl maybe
> it's better to apply the patches unconditionally, so they get some
> test cover from non-musl builds?
>
> Especially true in this case - see below.
>

Agreed. Patches should only be applied on overrides if they negatively
impact other configurations, so a strict correctness patch should always be
applied whereas a patch that stubs out glibc-specific code would be applied
on specific configurations.

Ross
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20160109/5f8a7262/attachment-0002.html>