[OE-core] [PATCH] stress-ng: add 0.05.09

Khem Raj raj.khem at gmail.com
Wed Jan 27 19:48:53 UTC 2016


On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Paul Eggleton
<paul.eggleton at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 14:28:47 Khem Raj wrote:
>> > On Jan 27, 2016, at 2:16 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko <denis at denix.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 09:20:23AM -0500, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 11:24:43AM +0000, Burton, Ross wrote:
>> >>> On 26 January 2016 at 03:34, Denys Dmytriyenko <denis at denix.org> wrote:
>> >>>> A clean room re-implementation and extension of the original stress
>> >>>> tool.
>> >>>
>> >>> What's the rationale for adding this to oe-core over another layer?
>> >>
>> >> None, besides the original stress is in oe-core. What other layer would
>> >> you
>> >> suggest?
>> >
>> > Ross,
>> >
>> > Care do make your own suggestion? Do you think meta-oe would be a better
>> > fit? Are there any other considerations, since stress-ng is a replacement
>> > of the original stress and it was added to oe-core? Thanks.
>>
>> IIRC we had meta-benchmarking. They all should go there.
>
> I guess you mean meta-oe/recipes-benchmark (though an actual separate layer
> might be interesting.)

yes recipes-benchmarking.

>
> Cheers,
> Paul
>
> --
>
> Paul Eggleton
> Intel Open Source Technology Centre



More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list