[OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] wic: clone gummiboot wks for systemd-boot

[Khem Raj]

> On Jul 25, 2016, at 11:40 AM, Jianxun Zhang <jianxun.zhang at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Jul 11, 2016, at 10:37 AM, Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Jianxun Zhang
>> <jianxun.zhang at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Jul 8, 2016, at 1:58 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Jianxun Zhang
>>>> <jianxun.zhang at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>>>> This wks is just a copy of gummiboot wks with bootloader
>>>>> changed to systemd-boot. A very basic boot test on a X86
>>>>> target is done with a direct-boot image generated by:
>>>>> 
>>>>> wic create mksystemd-bootdisk -e core-image-minimal
>>>> 
>>>> prefixing wks file with mk is that a nomenclature. if no then lets avoid it
>>> Khem,
>>> I thought following gummiboot wks naming is a safe call. :-)
>>> I can change it to any new name suggested, just want to avoid any ambiguity for a V2:
>>> Do you and others think “systemd-bootdisk” is a good name for new wks?
>>> 
>> 
>> yes looks better
>> 
> I have submitted V2 several days ago to address Khem’s suggestion to rename mksystemd-bootdisk.wks to systemd-boot.wks.
> 
> But today I found  this V1 has been merged in OE master (4c9b1a4). I am not sure if it means maintainers made decision to prefer V1.
> 
> You could see both wks files for same thing once V2 gets merged too.
> 
> Worrying about a duplicate merge for V2, I will notice people in V2 thread.

send a v3 rebased over v1
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 204 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20160725/c37570a8/attachment-0002.sig>