[OE-core] [PATCH 4/5] security_flags.inc: add epiphany to SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS

[Andre McCurdy]

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 3:59 AM, Alexander Kanavin
<alexander.kanavin at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Otherwise there is a QA warning about relocations in .text

Typically these warnings come from assembler and can't be fixed via
CFLAGS. If this one _can_ be fixed via CFLAGS then it suggests a bug
in the Epiphany build somewhere (e.g. reusing an object file intended
for a static lib in an .so). Maybe it's better to track that down and
fix properly instead of working around it by globally adding -fPIC to
CFLAGS?

> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin at linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  meta/conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc b/meta/conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc
> index 26804bd..ea00bdd 100644
> --- a/meta/conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc
> +++ b/meta/conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-glibc = ""
>  SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-glibc-initial = ""
>  SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-elfutils = "${SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS}"
>  SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-enchant = "${SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS}"
> +SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-epiphany = "${SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS}"
>  SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-expect = "${SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS}"
>  SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-flac = "${SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS}"
>  SECURITY_CFLAGS_pn-flex = "${SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS}"
> --
> 2.8.1
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core