[OE-core] [oe] [PATCH] gpsd: Fix build when static libs disabled

[Chris Trobridge]

Sorry wrong list again...

Still half asleep.

----------------------------------------
> From: christrobridge at hotmail.com
> To: openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 07:58:14 +0000
> Subject: [OE-core] [oe] [PATCH] gpsd: Fix build when static libs disabled
>
> http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2016-February/106230.html
>
>> Fix this build error:
>> SCons Error: no such option: --disable-static
>> Signed-off-by: Maxin B. John <maxin.john at intel.com>
>> ---
>> meta-oe/recipes-navigation/gpsd/gpsd_3.14.bb | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-navigation/gpsd/gpsd_3.14.bb b/meta-oe/recipes-navigation/gpsd/gpsd_3.14.bb
>> index ff268b3..a300595 100644
>> --- a/meta-oe/recipes-navigation/gpsd/gpsd_3.14.bb
>> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-navigation/gpsd/gpsd_3.14.bb
>> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ EXTRA_OESCONS = " \
>> systemd='${SYSTEMD_OESCONS}' \
>> ${EXTRA_OECONF} \
>> "
>> +DISABLE_STATIC = ""
>> & this cannot be used, because then chrpath is not found and only static lib is built
>> & target=${HOST_SYS}
>>
>> --
>> 2.4.0
>
> While this fixes the build, is it just fixing the symptom?
>
> I have a patch that copies the fix in:
>
> http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2016-February/106251.html
>
> That is: use EXTRA_CONF_PACKAGECONFIG instead of EXTRA_OECONF, as mentioned the above diff.
>
> This prevents the option being pulled in in the first place, which ought to be a more general solution.
>
> Regards,
> Chris
>
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core