[OE-core] [PATCH] buildhistory.bbclass: metadata-revs show repo parent

[Trevor Woerner]

On 03/12/16 16:54, Burton, Ross wrote:
>
> On 12 March 2016 at 04:28, Trevor Woerner <twoerner at gmail.com 
> <mailto:twoerner at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     openembedded-core/meta =
>     master:00d3fd571a8d261d065b43f5cf3076a381843984
>         meta-openembedded/meta-oe =
>     master:a1e135a499998add7575682bf53db5e02e753580
>         meta-openembedded/meta-gnome =
>     master:a1e135a499998add7575682bf53db5e02e753580
>         meta-rpb          =
>     master:203903ca6f4e8df09bef6ea3c6e899d07eca8df9
>         meta-96boards     =
>     master:2be59f0d381b5ec173d7fc24f3ae14aaf47b8649
>         meta-qcom         =
>     master:32fcda819acb8ec485d9ab05108d554f807bf75d
>         meta-browser      =
>     master:a3789a4168fcd42f1cdf5b5febe2c779a9467919
>         meta-linaro/meta-linaro-toolchain =
>     master:367f784b831938dc508b7d472342d2d0d6ed9769
>         meta-poky/meta    =
>     master:37b61b059031e3c272a929b834e12fd83f46598c
>         meta-poky/meta-poky =
>     master:37b61b059031e3c272a929b834e12fd83f46598c
>
>
> Why are you pulling oe-core/meta and poky/meta into the same build 
> considering they're literally the same layer?  You should either drop 
> oe-core/meta or poky/meta from your bblayers.

Ok, thanks; good point.

>
> However the output showing the full remote URLs seems a sensible 
> improvement to me.
>

My hesitation is whether we want to replace the existing 
buildhistory/metadata-revs with my "improvements" or whether I should 
just create a second file with the updates. I don't want to break 
anyone's process should they have come to rely on that file being as it is.