[OE-core] [PATCH 13/13] weston: Upgrade 1.9.0 -> 1.10.0

[Khem Raj]

> On May 16, 2016, at 3:43 AM, Otavio Salvador <otavio.salvador at ossystems.com.br> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 5:18 AM, Jussi Kukkonen
> <jussi.kukkonen at intel.com> wrote:
>> On 13 May 2016 at 23:15, Otavio Salvador
>> <otavio.salvador at ossystems.com.br> wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 4:20 AM, Jussi Kukkonen
>>> <jussi.kukkonen at intel.com> wrote:
>>>> Support for multiple new protocols, many new features:
>>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/2016-February/027039.html
>>>> 
>>>> Weston now depends on wayland-protocols (which is protocol
>>>> collection split off from weston).
>>>> 
>>>> Remove upstreamed patches, add a patch to fix the wayland-protocols
>>>> path used during build.
>>>> 
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jussi Kukkonen <jussi.kukkonen at intel.com>
>>> 
>>> I am working on rework the weston recipes and it seems Weston 1.11 is
>>> close of release. I think instead of adding 1.10 we could use 1.10.91
>>> and upgrade it to 1.11.0 when it is out (end of May). This avoids
>>> another cycle of rebase of patches during 2.2 development cycle.
>>> 
>>> What do you think?
>> 
>> I don't have a burning need to get 1.10 in at all (I almost didn't
>> send these in the first place because of 1.11 being just two weeks
>> away). If you'd rather avoid the churn I'm fine with doing other
>> things and looking at this again after 1.11 release. I'm also totally
>> happy to keep my paws off this completely if your rework is going to
>> include the 1.9 -> 1.11 upgrade in it.
>> 
>> Here's my current 1.10 branch in case it's useful (the important
>> change is the WAYLAND_PROTOCOLS_SYSROOT_DIR hack to get multilib
>> working with allarch wayland-protocols):
>>  git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-contrib jku/wayland-1.10
>>  http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=jku/wayland-1.10
>> 
>> Just to be clear: Based on this discussion I don't currently plan to
>> send a V2 to list unless there's demand for it.
> 
> As I said, I would work on 1.10.91 as it is close of 1.11 and easy the
> upgrade. But all my patches are based on 1.10 now so it is fine with
> me as well so please send the v2.

If 1.11 is around the corner then why not work on 1.11 ( pre-release ) itself
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 204 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20160516/14aad31d/attachment-0002.sig>