[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] gcc-sanitizers: Fix libtool library files

Yuanjie Huang yuanjie.huang at windriver.com
Sun Oct 9 01:43:07 UTC 2016


Hi Ross,

Is it recommended practice to remove libtool .la files for oe-core when 
some issue pops? If yes, I would withdraw and prepare a new patch that 
complies with the practice.

Thanks,
Yuanjie

On 09/21/2016 05:01 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
>
> On 21 September 2016 at 02:46, Yuanjie Huang 
> <yuanjie.huang at windriver.com <mailto:yuanjie.huang at windriver.com>> wrote:
>
>     We have some user making use of these libraries directly,
>     otherwise, cross gcc can link these sanitizer libraries with just
>     -fsantizer flag without problem. Without .la files, his flow can
>     not be libtoolized.
>
>
> libtool works fine without .la files on linux, which is why the 
> remove-libtool class works (which can be a distro-level inherit and 
> deletes every .la before it reaches the sysroot).
>
> Ross

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20161009/2a245861/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list