[OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] librsvg: Add missing pixbufcache dependencies

[Kyle Russell]

No, I haven't been able to reproduce it on demand, so there appears to be
some race scenario.  I have only seen the failure about libXdmcp a couple
of times.  It does look like libpixbufloader-svg.so depends on libxcb.so as
well, so if libxcb-native would be more appropriate here I can use that
instead (or in addition to libxdmcp?).

I suspect this list may still not be entirely complete, because ldd shows
several dependencies for libpixbufloader-svg.so.  However, I'm not really
that familiar with all the dependencies going on here; we are definitely
seeing sporadic failures for various native libraries during the
pixbufcache postinst task though.  Best I could tell, it looked like the
PIXBUFCACHE_SYSROOT_DEPS functionality was accidentally removed from the
pixbufcache.bbclass a while back (hence, my first patch).  Adding that hunk
back in has seemed to help most of the failures, but we still see lingering
failures for pixman and libXdmcp on occasion.

If PIXBUFCACHE_SYSROOT_DEPS is supposed to be satisfied another way, I'll
be glad to reevaluate.

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Burton, Ross <ross.burton at intel.com>
wrote:

>
> On 11 October 2016 at 15:17, Kyle Russell <bkylerussell at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> g_module_open() failed for libpixbufloader-svg.so: libXdmcp.so.6:
>> cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
>>
>
> Can you replicate this failure on demand?  I can't see why eg xdmcp needs
> to be in this list but say libxcb doesn't, which is presumably there that
> linkage is coming from.
>
> One solution for xdmcp would be to remove it entirely...
>
> Ross
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20161011/06643f72/attachment-0002.html>