[OE-core] [PATCH] kernel-arch.bbclass: Add xtensa and arc into valid_archs table

[Khem Raj]

> On Oct 11, 2016, at 9:31 AM, Juro Bystricky <juro.bystricky at intel.com> wrote:
> 
> Both "arc" and "xtensa" are valid Linux architectures, add
> them into valid_archs table.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Juro Bystricky <juro.bystricky at intel.com>
> ---
> meta/classes/kernel-arch.bbclass | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/meta/classes/kernel-arch.bbclass b/meta/classes/kernel-arch.bbclass
> index 8a4bef1..ea976c6 100644
> --- a/meta/classes/kernel-arch.bbclass
> +++ b/meta/classes/kernel-arch.bbclass
> @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ valid_archs = "alpha cris ia64 \
>                parisc s390  v850 \
>                avr32 blackfin \
>                microblaze \
> -               nios2"
> +               nios2 arc xtensa”

there parisc etc as well so in essence patch is ok but I wonder if we should
remove the arches we dont actively support in OE or extended OE ecosystem.

> 
> def map_kernel_arch(a, d):
>     import re
> --
> 2.7.4
> 
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 204 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20161017/7e84eea0/attachment-0002.sig>