[OE-core] meta-toolchain and meta-toolchain-qt for specific image
Denys Dmytriyenko
denis at denix.org
Thu Oct 20 13:24:40 UTC 2016
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 08:00:12PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>
> > On Oct 19, 2016, at 1:19 AM, thilo.cestonaro at ts.fujitsu.com wrote:
> >
> > Hey!
> >
> > I want to create such a nice toolchain installation package for my image recipe.
> > The problem I currently hit is, that I need to do populate_sdk and populate_sdk_qt5 to have qt5 toolchain too.
> >
> > Now I had an idea to create a recipe for the SDK like:
> >
> > ----------
> > SUMMARY = "Meta package for building an installable toolchain"
> > LICENSE = "MIT"
> >
> > PR = "r0"
> >
> > inherit populate_sdk populate_sdk_qt5
> > —————
>
>
> what is the advantage of such a recipe?
I guess the question is more generic...
The advantages of a separate meta-toolchain* recipe:
* a lot of flexibility
* not tied to a specific image
* can carry a lot of SDK customizations
> > But how can I tell the recipe to additionally install all the "*-dev" packages which my original image recipe installs.
> > When I require the image recipe, the toolchain recipe does a do_rootfs task (which is not needed, as it is done by building the image).
> >
> > I read something about TOOLCHAIN_TARGET_TASK and adding all the "*-dev" packages I want to this. But that doesn't work.
> >
> > Any hints?
> >
> > cheers,
> > Thilo--
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openembedded-core mailing list
> > Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list