[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] libnl: remove RREPLACES and RCONFLICTS for libnl-genl

[Robert Yang]

On 09/02/2016 07:27 PM, André Draszik wrote:
> On Fr, 2016-09-02 at 17:53 +0800, Robert Yang wrote:
>> Good questions, the libnl-genl2 in provides is introduced by
>> REPLACES_${PN}-genl = "libnl-genl2", so libnl-genl2 should be preserved.
>> And there was no libnl-genl.rpm in the past, but libnl-3-genl.rpm,
>> please see commit message for more info.
>>
>> Here is the updated patch:
>>
>>    git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib rbt/libnl
>>    http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=
>> rbt/libnl
>>
>> Robert Yang (1):
>>    libnl: fix RREPLACES and RCONFLICTS for libnl-genl
>>
>>
>> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] libnl: fix RREPLACES and RCONFLICTS for libnl-genl
>>
>> The libnl-genl.rpm provides libnl-genl-3-200 after the following 2 fixes:
>> libnl: update to v3.2.28
>> libnl: fix packaging mistakes
>>
>> $ rpm -qp --provides
>> tmp/deploy/rpm/core2_64/libnl-genl-3-200-3.2.28-r0.4.core2_64.rpm
>> elf(buildid) = 4e753b2361ba0b02f162244a87cc0680796e46cc
>> libnl-genl = 3.2.28
>> libnl-genl-3.so.200()(64bit)
>> libnl-genl-3.so.200(libnl_3)(64bit)
>> libnl-genl2
>> libnl-genl-3-200 = 1:3.2.28-r0.4
>>
>> Note, the libnl-genl2 is introduced by REPLACES_${PN}-genl = "libnl-
>> genl2".
>
> Ah, ok. And so is the last line, libnl-genl-3-200, I suppose. (The IPK
> backend doesn't seem to do that)
>
>> So that we don't need set libnl-genl-3-200 in the RREPLACES and
>> RCONFLICTS, otherwise it would cause do_rootfs errors when install both
>> libnl-genl.rpm and lib32-libnl-genl.rpm:
>>
>> Computing transaction...error: Can't install
>> libnl-genl-3-200-1:3.2.28-r0.0 at core2_64: conflicted package
>> libnl-genl-3-200-1:3.2.28-r0.0 at lib32_x86 is locked
>>
>> We didn't meet this error before was because there was no libnl-genl.rpm,
>                                                             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Should that be libnl-genl-3-200.rpm ?
>
>> but libnl-3-genl.rpm, and it doesn't provide libnl-genl-3-200 by default.
>
> OK.
>
> So now that there is nothing in ${bindir} of the -genl package anymore, it
> applies the normal package renaming using the SONAME, resulting in libnl-
> genl-3-200.
>
> Whereas previously it used ${PN}-genl as package name, where PN was set to
> libnl-3 during package creation. Why was it libnl-3 (why did it not use
> libnl-3-200 as prefix)?

The rename is done by debian.bbclass, you can take a look into it.

// Robert

>
> Cheers,
> Andre'
>
>