[OE-core] [oe-core][PATCH 1/1] libwebp: do not assume armv7a has neon intrinsics

Slater, Joseph joe.slater at windriver.com
Tue Sep 6 22:34:53 UTC 2016



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andre McCurdy [mailto:armccurdy at gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 1:52 PM
> To: Slater, Joseph
> Cc: OE Core mailing list
> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [oe-core][PATCH 1/1] libwebp: do not assume armv7a has neon
> intrinsics
> 
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Joe Slater <jslater at windriver.com> wrote:
> > configure incorrectly thinks -mfpu=neon is in CC for armv7a,
> > so defeat automatic neon detection.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joe Slater <jslater at windriver.com>
> > ---
> >  meta/recipes-multimedia/webp/libwebp_0.5.1.bb |    3 +++
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-multimedia/webp/libwebp_0.5.1.bb b/meta/recipes-
> multimedia/webp/libwebp_0.5.1.bb
> > index 222bd56..2d86b4a 100644
> > --- a/meta/recipes-multimedia/webp/libwebp_0.5.1.bb
> > +++ b/meta/recipes-multimedia/webp/libwebp_0.5.1.bb
> > @@ -26,6 +26,9 @@ EXTRA_OECONF = " \
> >      --enable-libwebpdemux \
> >      --enable-threading \
> >  "
> > +# configure incorrectly believes that armv7a has -mfpu=neon
> > +#
> > +EXTRA_OECONF_append_armv7a = " --disable-neon"
> 
> Unless you want to disable neon for all armv7a builds, perhaps
> something like this would be better:
> 
>   EXTRA_OECONF += "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "neon", "",
> "--disable-neon" ,d)}"

That's a good idea, but I'd only do the check for arm.  Also, if we do have
neon, shouldn't the core be armv7a-neon, or something like that?  Can't we
rely on the overrides?

Joe


> 
> >  inherit autotools lib_package
> >
> > --
> > 1.7.9.5
> >
> > --
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openembedded-core mailing list
> > Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core


More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list