[OE-core] [PATCH 2/3] systemd.bbclass: add support to manage user services

ChenQi Qi.Chen at windriver.com
Thu Sep 8 02:33:34 UTC 2016


On 09/07/2016 08:14 PM, Pau Espin Pedrol wrote:
>
> 2016-09-07 11:22 GMT+02:00 Chen Qi <Qi.Chen at windriver.com 
> <mailto:Qi.Chen at windriver.com>>:
>
>     Add new variable SYSTEMD_USER_SERVICE and SYSTEM_USER_AUTO_ENABLE
>     to manage user services. Their usage is like SYSTEMD_SERVICE and
>     SYSTEMD_AUTO_ENABLE.
>
>     [YOCTO #7800]
>
>     Signed-off-by: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen at windriver.com
>     <mailto:Qi.Chen at windriver.com>>
>     ---
>      meta/classes/systemd.bbclass | 17 +++++++++++++----
>      1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
>     diff --git a/meta/classes/systemd.bbclass
>     b/meta/classes/systemd.bbclass
>     index db7873f..78cec97 100644
>     --- a/meta/classes/systemd.bbclass
>     +++ b/meta/classes/systemd.bbclass
>     @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ SYSTEMD_PACKAGES_class-nativesdk ?= ""
>
>      # Whether to enable or disable the services on installation.
>      SYSTEMD_AUTO_ENABLE ??= "enable"
>     +SYSTEMD_USER_AUTO_ENABLE ??= "enable"
>
>      # This class will be included in any recipe that supports systemd
>     init scripts,
>      # even if systemd is not in DISTRO_FEATURES.  As such don't make
>     any changes
>     @@ -30,10 +31,14 @@ fi
>
>      if type systemctl >/dev/null 2>/dev/null; then
>             systemctl $OPTS ${SYSTEMD_AUTO_ENABLE} ${SYSTEMD_SERVICE}
>     +       systemctl $OPTS --global ${SYSTEMD_USER_AUTO_ENABLE}
>     ${SYSTEMD_USER_SERVICE}
>
>
> I'm not sure having these 2 systemctl being executed together 
> everytime is a good idea. What if a recipe has a user service and no 
> system service?

Hi Pau Espin Pedrol,

Thanks for your review.

The postinstall script runs successfully with expected result at rootfs 
time. But your question reminds me of the situation of the on-target 
install/remove situation. I think I'll need to make a new patch to make 
sure things work in both situations.

The key point here is that 'systemctl' at rootfs time is a shell script 
written by ourselves and 'systemctl' on target is that provided by systemd.

> We are calling the first one with an empty system service? Or we are 
> may be enabling a systemd system service which should not be enabled 
> according to the recipe? I have the feeling this kind of cases are not 
> being catch in here and other pkg scripts in this commit.
>
> It is far from perfect, but in case you didn't, you may want to have a 
> look at my initial/previous commit to try to fix the issue: 
> https://www.mail-archive.com/openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org/msg42187.html
>
>
>             if [ -z "$D" -a "${SYSTEMD_AUTO_ENABLE}" = "enable" ]; then
>                     systemctl restart ${SYSTEMD_SERVICE}
>             fi
>     +       if [ -z "$D" -a "${SYSTEMD_USER_AUTO_ENABLE}" = "enable"
>     ]; then
>     +               systemctl --global restart ${SYSTEMD_USER_SERVICE}
>     +       fi
>      fi
>      }
>
>     @@ -47,9 +52,11 @@ fi
>      if type systemctl >/dev/null 2>/dev/null; then
>             if [ -z "$D" ]; then
>                     systemctl stop ${SYSTEMD_SERVICE}
>     +               systemctl --global stop ${SYSTEMD_USER_SERVICE}
>
>
> I think this is not gonna work, you cannot call --global with stop 
> afair. I'm not sure which is the good solution for this though, but 
> you should ideally go through all systemd user sessions and call 
> "systemctl --user stop". No idea if that's actually easily feasible.

The service is enabled and started with '--global' option, and stopping 
it with '--global' option seems reasonable to me. If there's some 
special case, let's look into it then.

Best Regards,
Chen Qi

>             fi
>
>             systemctl $OPTS disable ${SYSTEMD_SERVICE}
>     +       systemctl $OPTS --global disable ${SYSTEMD_USER_SERVICE}
>      fi
>      }
>
>     @@ -139,12 +146,14 @@ python systemd_populate_packages() {
>          def systemd_check_services():
>              searchpaths = [oe.path.join(d.getVar("sysconfdir", True),
>     "systemd", "system"),]
>              searchpaths.append(d.getVar("systemd_system_unitdir", True))
>     +        searchpaths.append(oe.path.join(d.getVar("sysconfdir",
>     True), "systemd", "user"))
>     +        searchpaths.append(d.getVar("systemd_user_unitdir", True))
>              systemd_packages = d.getVar('SYSTEMD_PACKAGES', True)
>
>              keys = 'Also'
>              # scan for all in SYSTEMD_SERVICE[]
>              for pkg_systemd in systemd_packages.split():
>     -            for service in get_package_var(d, 'SYSTEMD_SERVICE',
>     pkg_systemd).split():
>     +            for service in (get_package_var(d, 'SYSTEMD_SERVICE',
>     pkg_systemd) + get_package_var(d, 'SYSTEMD_USER_SERVICE',
>     pkg_systemd)).split():
>                      path_found = ''
>
>                      # Deal with adding, for example,
>     'ifplugd at eth0.service' from
>     @@ -165,14 +174,14 @@ python systemd_populate_packages() {
>                      if path_found != '':
>                          systemd_add_files_and_parse(pkg_systemd,
>     path_found, service, keys)
>                      else:
>     -                    raise bb.build.FuncFailed("SYSTEMD_SERVICE_%s
>     value %s does not exist" % \
>     -                        (pkg_systemd, service))
>     +                    raise bb.build.FuncFailed("SYSTEMD_SERVICE_%s
>     or SYSTEMD_USER_SERVICE_%s value %s does not exist" % \
>     +                        (pkg_systemd, pkg_systemd, service))
>
>          # Run all modifications once when creating package
>          if os.path.exists(d.getVar("D", True)):
>              for pkg in d.getVar('SYSTEMD_PACKAGES', True).split():
>                  systemd_check_package(pkg)
>     -            if d.getVar('SYSTEMD_SERVICE_' + pkg, True):
>     +            if d.getVar('SYSTEMD_SERVICE_' + pkg, True) or
>     d.getVar('SYSTEMD_USER_SERVICE_' + pkg, True):
>                      systemd_generate_package_scripts(pkg)
>              systemd_check_services()
>      }
>     --
>     1.9.1
>
>     --
>     _______________________________________________
>     Openembedded-core mailing list
>     Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
>     <mailto:Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org>
>     http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>     <http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20160908/cced79c8/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list