[OE-core] [PATCH 0/9] kernel-yocto: consolidated pull request

[Bruce Ashfield]

On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 8:11 AM, Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 7:42 AM, Richard Purdie <
> richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 2017-08-20 at 22:58 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > Here's the collected set of kernel changes that are ready for the M3
>> > builds.
>> >
>> > We have some kernel meta data changes:
>> >
>> >   kernel-yocto: configuration updates: x86 features
>> >   linux-yocto/4.1: fix fsl-ls10xx sdhci
>> >   linux-yocto: add usb-net configs by default
>> >
>> > Some bug fixes:
>> >
>> >   kernel-yocto: ensure that only valid BSPs are built
>> >   linux-yocto/4.10: CVE & misc fixes
>> >
>> > And the important changes are the addition of the 4.12 kernel + libc
>> > headers
>> > and the removal of the 4.1 kernel.
>> >
>> > I also have some -stable updates queued for the active kernel
>> > versions, but
>> > they will come out once this series has made it into the tree, since
>> > I'm
>> > trying to isolate any 4.12 issues from other -stable updates.
>> >
>> > I built and booted all the qemu targets for 4.12, and have built for
>> > core-image-sato, core-image-kernel-dev, glibc and muslc for all of
>> > the
>> > architectures. My testing didn't pick up any regressions, but I was
>> > battling
>> > some other build errors (non kernel related) during my testing, so I
>> > can
>> > never be 100% sure.
>> >
>> > I've sent patches to poky to remove/bump any references to the 4.1
>> > kernel
>> > .. if I've missed any, I'm sure people will shout.
>>
>> I added an extra patch for the ones you missed in meta-yocto-bsp ;-)
>>
>> Also, https://autobuilder.yocto.io/builders/build-appliance/builds/425/
>> steps/BuildImages_1/logs/stdio
>> <https://autobuilder.yocto.io/builders/build-appliance/builds/425/steps/BuildImages_1/logs/stdio>
>>
>> Error:
>>  Problem: conflicting requests
>>   - nothing provides /bin/awk needed by kernel-devsrc-1.0-r0.0.qemux86_64
>>
>
> Hmm. I've built that exact combination on two different builders in the
> past week
> and have never seen this.
>
> How do I find out about the environment on that machine ? Because I'm not
> going
> to be able to reproduce it here.
>

A little bit more information. Saul fixed this earlier this year, and I'm
still carrying
a patch that ensures that /usr/bin/awk is in the ver_linux script instead
of /bin/awk.
That fix used to satisfy a similar requirement.

That being said, I did notice that Saul's change was accepted upstream and
the
patch I'm carrying is not correctly applied (but it should be an invalid
patch, not
a reference to /bin/awk).

I've fixed that patch, and am building the build-appliance image now.

I will have a new set of SRCREVs for linux-yocto-4.12, but I can't say if
they'll
fix the particular issue that the autobuilder is seeing.

Bruce


>
> Bruce
>
>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Richard
>>
>>
>> --
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>>
>
>
>
> --
> "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee
> at its end"
>



-- 
"Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee
at its end"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20170821/ddd990d2/attachment-0002.html>