[OE-core] [PATCH v2] image_types.bbclass: Added default argument for ubi and ubifs image creation

Choong, Yin Thong yin.thong.choong at intel.com
Thu Jun 15 07:52:35 UTC 2017


I get the information thru the official ubi and ubifs website. http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/faq/ubifs.html
Besides I also tested with core-image-sato-sdk build which required more -c maximum size to create the image. If the configuration size is no sufficient error will highlight and build fail.

Default -c is 2047. If build core-image-sato-sdk. -c parameter has to be increased to 8749 which will be highlight on the build error.

Thanks and Regards
Choong YinThong

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrea Adami [mailto:andrea.adami at gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 3:20 PM
To: Choong, Yin Thong <yin.thong.choong at intel.com>
Cc: OE-core <openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org>; otc-pg-team at eclists.intel.com; Eggleton, Paul <paul.eggleton at intel.com>; Wold, Saul <saul.wold at intel.com>
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2] image_types.bbclass: Added default argument for ubi and ubifs image creation

On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 1:05 AM,  <yin.thong.choong at intel.com> wrote:
> From: Choong YinThong <yin.thong.choong at intel.com>
>
> Added default argument for ubi and ubifs image creation.

Hello,

Is it better to error out *before* ot to create an *invalid* image?
How can you guess such defaults?

Cheers
Andrea



> MKUBIFS_ARGS and UBINIZE_ARGS both argument still able to edit in 
> local.conf
>
> [YOCTO #11589]
>
> Signed-off-by: Choong YinThong <yin.thong.choong at intel.com>
> ---
>  meta/classes/image_types.bbclass | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/meta/classes/image_types.bbclass 
> b/meta/classes/image_types.bbclass
> index 7749b00..bbde08d 100644
> --- a/meta/classes/image_types.bbclass
> +++ b/meta/classes/image_types.bbclass
> @@ -292,3 +292,12 @@ IMAGE_EXTENSION_live = "hddimg iso"
>  # The IMAGE_TYPES_MASKED variable will be used to mask out from the 
> IMAGE_FSTYPES,  # images that will not be built at do_rootfs time: vmdk, vdi, qcow2, hdddirect, hddimg, iso, etc.
>  IMAGE_TYPES_MASKED ?= ""
> +
> +# Default argument to create ubi and ubifs image with 
> +core-image-sato-sdk 
> +(http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/faq/ubifs.html)
> +# -m 2048: tells mkfs.ubifs that the minimum input/output unit size 
> +of the flash this UBIFS image is created for is 2048 bytes (NAND page 
> +in this case); # -e 129024: logical eraseblock size of the UBI volume this image is created for; # -c 8749: specifies maximum file-system size in logical eraseblocks; this means that it will be possible to use the resulting file-system on volumes up to this size (less or equivalent); so in this particular case, the resulting FS may be put on volumes up to about 251MiB (129024 multiplied by 2047); See this section for more details.
> +# -p 128KiB: tells ubinize that physical eraseblock size of the flash 
> +chip the UBI image is created for is 128KiB (128 * 1024 bytes); # -s 512: tells ubinize that the flash supports sub-pages and sub-page size is 512 bytes; ubinize will take this into account and put the VID header to the same NAND page as the EC header.
> +MKUBIFS_ARGS ??= " -m 2048 -e 129024 -c 8749 "
> +UBINIZE_ARGS ??= " -p 128KiB -m 2048 -s 512 "
> --
> 2.7.4
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core


More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list