[OE-core] ✗ patchtest: failure for #10618: Increase oe-selftest coverage of wic codebase (first part)

[Leonardo Sandoval]

On Thu, 2017-03-23 at 15:57 +1300, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> Hi Leo,
> 
> On Thursday, 23 March 2017 9:53:31 AM NZDT Patchwork wrote:
> > == Series Details ==
> > 
> > Series: #10618: Increase oe-selftest coverage of wic codebase (first part)
> > Revision: 1
> > URL   : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/5923/
> > State : failure
> > 
> > == Summary ==
> > 
> > 
> > Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core. This is
> > an automated response. Several tests have been executed on the proposed
> > series by patchtest resulting in the following results:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > * Issue             [pretest_src_uri_checksums_not_changed]
> > 
> > * Issue             No modified recipes, skipping pretest
> > [pretest_src_uri_left_files]
> > 
> > * Issue             No added or modified recipes, skipping pretest
> > [pretest_lic_files_chksum_modified_not_mentioned]
> > 
> > * Issue             [pretest_pylint]
> > 
> > * Issue             [test_max_line_length]
> > 
> > * Issue             [test_cve_presence_in_commit_message]
> > 
> > * Issue             [test_cve_tag_format]
> > 
> > * Issue             [test_shortlog_format]
> > 
> > * Issue             [test_shortlog_length]
> > 
> > * Issue             [test_summary_presence]
> > 
> > * Issue             [test_upstream_status_format]
> > 
> > * Issue             There are no new software patches, no reason to test
> > Upstream-Status presence [test_upstream_status_presence]
> > 
> > * Issue             Until general agreement with the community, disabling it
> > [test_commit_message_presence]
> > 
> > * Issue             [test_mbox_format]
> > 
> > * Issue             [test_series_merge_on_head]
> > 
> > * Issue             [test_src_uri_checksums_not_changed]
> > 
> > * Issue             No modified recipes, skipping pretest
> > [test_src_uri_left_files]
> > 
> > * Issue             [test_bugzilla_entry_format]
> > 
> > * Issue             [test_signed_off_by_presence]
> > 
> > * Issue             There are no new software patches, no reason to test
> > Signed-off-by presence [test_signed_off_by_presence]
> > 
> > * Issue             Series merged, no reason to check other mailing lists
> > [test_target_mailing_list]
> > 
> > * Issue             No modified or added recipes, skipping test
> > [test_lic_files_chksum_modified_not_mentioned]
> > 
> > * Issue             No added recipes, skipping test
> > [test_lic_files_chksum_presence]
> > 
> > * Issue             [test_pylint]
> > 
> > * Issue             [test_author_valid]
> 
> These results look a bit broken - some are skipped and really shouldn't be 
> showing at all. Was the script invoked in a different way to normal?
> 

Yes, it was invoked in a different way (there was not filtering on
failures). From now on, we should be getting emails just with test
failures. 

Leo

> Cheers,
> Paul
> 
> -- 
> 
> Paul Eggleton
> Intel Open Source Technology Centre