[OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-03-27

[Martin Jansa]

> Can individual recipes choose to be built using the normal ld?

yes, see example in:
meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc
meta/recipes-support/libunwind/libunwind_git.bb

but it was working with older binutils, so maybe worth tracking down where
it got borken.

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly at intel.com>
wrote:

> On Wed, 2017-03-29 at 11:14 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:35:23AM +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2017-03-29 at 09:23 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > > > INFO: jenkins-job.sh-1.8.19 Complete log available at
> http://logs.nslu2-linux.org/buildlogs/oe/world/pyro/log.
> report.20170328_014155.log
> > >
> > > That used OE-core 552bd78, if I read this right:
> > >
> > >         == Tested changes (not included in master yet) -
> openembedded-core ==
> > >         latest upstream commit:
> > >         552bd78 wic: use kernel_dir to find systemd-efi bootloader
> > >
> > > >     * openembedded-core/meta/recipes-core/ovmf/ovmf_git.bb:
> do_compile
> > >
> > > http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/135202/
> > >
> > > "gcc-ar: not found" - that should have been fixed by OE-core 23a12d87a6
> > > "fix toolchain selection", which is included in OE-core 552bd78 and
> thus
> > > should have been included in the build.
> > >
> > > However, the error above was "Submitted on: 11/03/17 10:13", which was
> a
> > > while ago and in particular before that fix.
> > >
> > > Did ovmf really fail in the latest world build?
> >
> > The report shows:
> > http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Build/34933/
> > which leads to:
> >
> > http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/138261/
> > Submitted on: 27/03/17 05:31
>
> Got it. I followed the wrong link at some point.
>
> > So yes it failed again, but this time with different error:
> > TOPDIR/tmp-glibc/work/i586-oe-linux/ovmf/git-r0/recipe-
> sysroot-native/usr/bin/i586-oe-linux/../../libexec/i586-
> oe-linux/gcc/i586-oe-linux/6.3.0/ld:
> > internal error in do_layout, at ../../gold/object.cc:1821
>
> Hmm, internal error in gold. Not sure what to do about that :-/
>
> Can individual recipes choose to be built using the normal ld?
>
> --
> Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
>
> The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
> I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
> represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
> on behalf of Intel on this matter.
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20170329/3937557d/attachment-0002.html>