[OE-core] [PATCH] u-boot: Update to 2017.03 release

Otavio Salvador otavio.salvador at ossystems.com.br
Thu Mar 30 19:26:58 UTC 2017


On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Philip Balister <philip at balister.org> wrote:
> I've got a machine under development that boots from the 2013.01 recipe
> and a bbappend. I don't think it is a problem moving to .03, but I don't
> know. I'm not sure how many other BSP's have done the same.

If it is a full mainline machine it should be smooth; otherwise
sending the patch to enable it in mainline is the best long term
solution. Keeping a patch on top a recipe is a decision which ends
with the maintenance burden at the developer adding the patch.

External layers should not delay the additions or upgrades of recipes
of OE-Core. If maintenance is a concern, upstreaming is the best
choice or fork the U-Boot and keep the fork with an independent cycle.

> Meanwhile, I understand the desire of others who have work upstreamed in
> u-boot they like to use with the next release.

And it has been a way to endorse the upstreaming effort to reduce the
maintenance work.

> How many u-boot releases are there a year? How do they line up with YP
> releases? Should we carry two u-boot versions, similar to what happens
> with the kernel?

Every two months now. I see no reason to carry two versions. OE-Core
provides the basis and every BSP layers can maintain their own
versions.

-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750



More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list