[OE-core] [PATCH] recipes-support: Add recipe for libgpiod

Burton, Ross ross.burton at intel.com
Fri May 12 14:23:37 UTC 2017


On 11 May 2017 at 23:28, Denys Dmytriyenko <denis at denix.org> wrote:

> As of having an alternative for other potential users - there's nothing
> wrong
> with it. But, acceptance criteria into OE-Core is quite high, especially
> when
> there are alternative solutions already available. That's why I'm asking if
> it's any better than the other solution. In other words, why libgpiod
> should
> be accepted to OE-Core, but not libsoc? Maybe it should be submitted to
> meta-openembedded layer instead?
>

Agreed, the barrier for oe-core is high on purpose and I don't think this
is general purpose enough.  meta-oe is a perfect fit though.

Ross
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20170512/6a10e9f1/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list