[OE-core] [PATCH] boost: add ptest support
Yang Wang
yang.wang at windriver.com
Tue Aug 28 17:22:45 UTC 2018
On 08/28/2018 10:25 AM, Yang Wang wrote:
> On 08/27/2018 08:57 PM, Randy MacLeod wrote:
>> On 08/27/2018 06:17 PM, Yang Wang wrote:
>>> Not sure if it's worth to run the Ptest on QEMU though, I also run
>>> Ptest on SIMICS simulators, thousands of tests didn't get run, looks
>>> like the result was not good as well.
>>>
>>> Now my nightly Ptest runs on x86 device and gets consistent result
>>> every day:
>>>
>>> 2018-08-27T06:26 -- 2018-08-27T09:52
>>> Passed: 40518
>>> Failed: 289
>>> Skipped: 1876
>>
>> Consistent results are good and > 90% pass rate is very good.
>> What are the stats using qemux86-64 and/or simics?
>>
>> I don't expect that qemu results would be as close to real hardware
>> as Simics but it is quite good and freely available.
>>
> Actually, Ptest has 37 test suites as far as I know, different test
> suites spent different time on QEMU and hardware, here is a list of
> Ptest suites and their case number and spent time for running:
>
>
Just want to make it look better:
==============
# Suite Name Case # Time to Run Case # Time to Run
qemu-x86-64 intel-xeon-core2
1 acl 2 1m 380 1m
2 attr 143 1m 143 1m
3 bash 79 8m 79 4m
4 bluez5 7 6m 7 6m
5 bzip2 6 1m 6 1m
6 dbus-test 15 3m 15 1m
7 diffutils 20 1m 20 2m
8 e2fsprogs 147 9m 335 10m
9 ethtool 2 1m 2 1m
10 flex 114 3m 114 1m
11 gawk 300 3m 298 2m
12 gdbm 30 2m 25 2m
13 glib-2.0 62 14m 220 6m
14 gzip 51 4m 18 1m
15 kbd 15 1m 7 1m
16 libevent 22 6m 1 3m
17 libpcre 34 3m 3 1m
18 libxml2 1 1m 0 1m
19 lzo 75 8m 5 3m
20 mdadm 6m 6m
21 nettle 90 3m 90 3m
22 numactl 8 3m
23 openssh 13 27m 47 52m
24 openssl 87 47m 56 15m
25 parted 64 5m 38 10m
26 perl 101 20m 2440 47m
27 perl5 110 17m 2406 29m
28 python 10961 1h 5m 32323 20m
29 rsyslog 2200 3h 37m 25 8m
30 sed 147 1m 86 3m
31 slang 96 1m
32 strace 1557 1h 13m 431 6m
33 systemd 305 9m 155 3m
34 tcl 869 53m 206 6m
35 tcpdump 451 7m 413 3m
36 util-linux 516 25m 514 13m
37 zlib 2 1m 2 1m
Overall 18080 10h 30m 40415 4h 15m
>
> As you can see, running subset of them on QEMU could be a solution if
> people do not want to spend too much time on it or simulator is the
> preferred test device.
>
> Thanks,
> -Yang
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Yang Wang
>>
>>
>
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list