[OE-core] [PATCH 2/9] gnomebase-meson.bbclass: add a meson-specific version

[Martin Kelly]

On 01/10/2018 10:48 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 09:55 -0800, Martin Kelly wrote:
>> On 01/05/2018 06:57 AM, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
>>>
>>> On 01/05/2018 01:47 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Do we even need gnomebase-meson with this?  I can see a future
>>>> where
>>>> GNOME is entirely Meson and then we could just switch the
>>>> default
>>>> GNOMEBASEBUILDCLASS from autotools to meson.
>>>>
>>>> (prior art being the tarball compression type)
>>>
>>> I'm fine with this. Just so everyone else knows: RP has actually
>>> made
>>> the change already, and merged everything to master, so the YP
>>> supports
>>> meson as a first class citizen now.
>>>
>>> Alex
>> Technically I'd call it a 0.9-class citizen, as the SDK doesn't work
>> yet
>> :), but still a whole lot better than 0.
> 
> We'll get there and patches are very welcome.
> 
> Also *very* welcome would be some SDK tests which illustrate the
> problem so we can a) fix it and b) ensure it doesn't regress again!
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Richard
> 

Yes, to be clear, I'm not griping, as I'm very happy meson landed in 
OE-core, and I'm working on SDK support now. I have an OE-core thread 
going with meson upstream to get the issue fixed.

To be clear though, I'm not sure it even regressed. AFAICT, it never 
quite worked.

Where would I add SDK tests for this?