[OE-core] [RFC][PATCH 0/5] Kernel artifacts naming changes

Martin Jansa martin.jansa at gmail.com
Mon Jul 2 14:16:44 UTC 2018


Any comment about this RFC?

Should I send rebased version?

On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 12:58 PM Otavio Salvador <
otavio.salvador at ossystems.com.br> wrote:

> Hello Martin,
>
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 6:11 PM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> ...
> > This RFC doesn't implement it all, but it makes naming all the artifacts
> in
> > consistent way a bit easier. If there is an agreement that OE should
> support
> > the naming scenario described above, I'll submit the rest of the changes.
>
> I think it all makes sense and if we preserve current behavior as
> default I see it as a very good addition :-)
>
> I didn't test the patches myself and I'd like to do a more extensive
> test once you send the full patchset.
>
> --
> Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
> http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
> Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20180702/a7566423/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list