[OE-core] [rocko][PATCH] common-licenses: Add BSD-1-Clause

[Khem Raj]

On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 10:52 AM Andre McCurdy <armccurdy at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 9:20 AM, Mark Hatle <mark.hatle at windriver.com> wrote:
> > On 6/15/18 7:23 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:48 PM Andre McCurdy <armccurdy at gmail.com
> >> <mailto:armccurdy at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>     On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com
> >>     <mailto:raj.khem at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>     > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:14 PM Mark Hatle <mark.hatle at windriver.com
> >>     <mailto:mark.hatle at windriver.com>> wrote:
> >>     >>
> >>     >> On 6/15/18 3:16 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote:
> >>     >> > From: André Draszik <andre.draszik at jci.com <mailto:andre.draszik at jci.com>>
> >>     >> >
> >>     >> > Some projects are starting to use it.
> >>     >> >   https://spdx.org/licenses//BSD-1-Clause.html
> >>     >> >
> >>     >> > Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik at jci.com
> >>     <mailto:andre.draszik at jci.com>>
> >>     >> > Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton at intel.com
> >>     <mailto:ross.burton at intel.com>>
> >>     >> > (cherry picked from commit 77f692ecb39d880b2cb420850a31534860eb2cc5)
> >>     >> > Signed-off-by: Andre McCurdy <armccurdy at gmail.com
> >>     <mailto:armccurdy at gmail.com>>
> >>     >> > ---
> >>     >> >  meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause | 9 +++++++++
> >>     >> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >>     >> >  create mode 100644 meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
> >>     >> >
> >>     >> > diff --git a/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
> >>     b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
> >>     >> > new file mode 100644
> >>     >> > index 0000000..ded8897
> >>     >> > --- /dev/null
> >>     >> > +++ b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
> >>     >> > @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> >>     >> > +
> >>     >> > +Copyright (c) <YEAR>, <OWNER>
> >>     >> > +All rights reserved.
> >>     >> > +
> >>     >> > +Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
> >>     modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
> >>     >> > +
> >>     >> > +Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice,
> >>     this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
> >>     >> > +THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY Berkeley Software Design, Inc. "AS IS"
> >>     AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
> >>     >>
> >>     >> Hate to nitpick, but isn't BSDi defunct?  I don't think it makes sense to
> >>     list
> >>     >> BSDI, since as far as I know they never had a '1-Clause' license.
> >>     >>
> >>     >> Maybe a <Organization Here> would be more appropriate.
> >>     >>
> >>     >
> >>     > I think we should sync the files we carry with SPDX e.g.
> >>     > https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data/tree/master/text
> >>
> >>     It doesn't look like that will fix the inconsistencies... those
> >>     versions are inconsistent too:
> >>
> >> We should report that to spdx folks since they
> >> Work on licenses and might be interested in addressing this
> >
> > Agreed.  I think we need to get the SPDX to fix their examples, and then use
> > them once they are fixed.
> >
> > As for our version of the code, I'd suggest the "<COPYRIGHT HOLDER>" (as in the
> > BSD-4-clause example) in all cases.
>
> Agreed. So while Mark and Khem fix up master, is it OK for Armin to
> backport the current version to rocko? Or should master and sumo be
> updated first?

It should get into master for sure before it hits release branches.