[OE-core] [PATCH 3/4] mtd-utils: upgrade 2.0.1 -> 2.0.2

[Burton, Ross]

Master builds fine for me, but interestingly I don't see that in my
mtd-utils unpack.  Do you have patches?

Ross

On 21 June 2018 at 12:10, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa at gmail.com> wrote:
> Does this upgrade fix the build failure with gcc8?
>
> With current master I'm seeing:
> super0.c:238:32: error: 'snprintf' output may be truncated before the last
> format character [-Werror=format-truncation=]
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 12:33 PM Burton, Ross <ross.burton at intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> Sorry, no it doesn't.  I've just picked this in ross/mut but a
>> follow-up patch to remove that mystery patch (can't see it being used
>> in image generation anywhere) would be good.
>>
>> Ross
>>
>> On 20 June 2018 at 00:53, Denys Dmytriyenko <denis at denix.org> wrote:
>> > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 01:16:34PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote:
>> >> On 22 May 2018 at 08:49, Andrea Adami <andrea.adami at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > I am just wondering about this patch:we carry it since 2009  [1] and
>> >> > is still marked as pending.
>> >> > Why was it necessary to ignore part of the filesystem? Can you
>> >> > remember?
>> >>
>> >> Make that at least 2004.  This commit in oe-classic touches it:
>> >>
>> >> commit c70605ebdca81412a93b4d867de7931543193f26
>> >> Author: Chris Larson <clarson at kergoth.com>
>> >> Date:   Thu Dec 23 21:24:57 2004 +0000
>> >>
>> >>     Update mtd to a current snapshot, change the mkfs.jffs2 -i cmdline
>> >> option to
>> >>     -I, and rename mtd and mtd-native to mtd-utils and
>> >> mtd-utils-native,
>> >>     respectively.
>> >>
>> >> Prior history is lost to the git/bk migration unless anyone has a
>> >> BitKeeper clone to mine...
>> >
>> > So, does this prevent the version upgrade from being merged?
>> >
>> > --
>> > Denys
>> --
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core