[OE-core] [PATCH v2] kernel-devsrc: restructure for out of tree (and on target) module builds
Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfield at windriver.com
Thu Mar 1 14:45:44 UTC 2018
On 2018-03-01 9:22 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> Swore I picked the v2 patch for the second run, I've fired a mini test
> build to see.
The other failures reported were valid and not addressed by v2. So only
32 bit ARM would have been fixed (packaging wise), the rest were ok.
I build and deployed kernel-devsrc for ARM multiple times, so if it does
actually fail again .. I'm *very* interested to hear.
Bruce
>
> Ross
>
> On 1 March 2018 at 13:59, Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield at windriver.com
> <mailto:bruce.ashfield at windriver.com>> wrote:
>
> On 2018-03-01 5:58 AM, Maxin B. John wrote:
>
>
> Also fails on musl:
>
> ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'glibc-utils' (but
> /home/pokybuild/yocto-autobuilder/yocto-worker/nightly-musl/build/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/kernel-devsrc.bb
> <http://kernel-devsrc.bb> RDEPENDS on or otherwise requires it)
>
> Ross
>
> On 1 March 2018 at 08:28, Maxin B. John
> <maxin.john at intel.com <mailto:maxin.john at intel.com>> wrote:
>
>
> >On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 02:20:45PM -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> >> The existing kernel-devsrc package starts with a full copy
> of the kernel
> >> source and then starts to strip out elements that are not
> required.
> >>
> >> This results in extra time (I/O) and extra space being
> taken up in the
> >> final package. The main purpose of the kernel-devsrc
> package has been to
> >> build modules against the running kernel, not to include a
> full copy of
> >> the source code for re-building the kernel. The end result
> was a
> >> 600M kernel-devsrc package.
>
> Other failures are listed below:
> arm64:
> https://autobuilder.yocto.io/builders/nightly-arm64/builds/790/steps/Running%20Sanity%20Tests/logs/stdio
> <https://autobuilder.yocto.io/builders/nightly-arm64/builds/790/steps/Running%20Sanity%20Tests/logs/stdio>
>
> RESULTS - kernelmodule.KernelModuleTest.test_kernel_module -
> Testcase 1541: FAILED
>
> HOSTCC scripts/sortextable
> scripts/sortextable.c:31:10: fatal error:
> tools/be_byteshift.h: No such file or directory
> #include <tools/be_byteshift.h>
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> compilation terminated.
> make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.host:102: scripts/sortextable]
> Error 1
> make: *** [Makefile:557: scripts] Error 2
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Similar on qemuarm - poky-lsb :
>
> https://autobuilder.yocto.io/builders/nightly-arm-lsb/builds/812/steps/Running%20Sanity%20Tests/logs/stdio
> <https://autobuilder.yocto.io/builders/nightly-arm-lsb/builds/812/steps/Running%20Sanity%20Tests/logs/stdio>
>
> HOSTCC scripts/recordmcount
> HOSTCC scripts/sortextable
> scripts/sortextable.c:31:10: fatal error: tools/be_byteshift.h:
> No such file or directory
> #include <tools/be_byteshift.h>
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> compilation terminated.
> make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.host:102:
> scripts/sortextable] Error 1
> make: *** [Makefile:557: scripts] Error 2
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Also on PowerPC:
>
> https://autobuilder.yocto.io/builders/nightly-ppc-lsb/builds/814/steps/Running%20Sanity%20Tests/logs/stdio
> <https://autobuilder.yocto.io/builders/nightly-ppc-lsb/builds/814/steps/Running%20Sanity%20Tests/logs/stdio>
>
> scripts/sortextable.c:31:10: fatal error: tools/be_byteshift.h:
> No such file or directory
> #include <tools/be_byteshift.h>
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> compilation terminated.
> make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.host:102: scripts/sortextable]
> Error 1
> make: *** [Makefile:557: scripts] Error 2
>
>
> I have all these fixed now.
>
> Will have a look at musl next.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bruce
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Maxin
>
>
>
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list