[OE-core] [PATCH] alsa-utils: Fix error when removing unwanted udev rules

[Tanu Kaskinen]

On Tue, 2018-05-01 at 12:36 +0100, Mike Crowe wrote:
> If alsa-utils configure is not passed a --with-udev-rules-dir option then
> it defaults to using /lib/udev/rules.d. This meant that the hard-coded use
> of ${D}/lib in do_install in 262e69c9c7acf0beb7bb6b96299e3c993c906434
> worked correctly to remove the unwanted rules.
> 
> Subsequently, 0a4372705a030ca54ed420cdfec33d46ab93499c changed do_install
> to use ${nonarch_base_libdir}, claiming to fix this in the usrmerge case.
> 
> This means that if udev is not present in PACKAGECONFIG and usrmerge is
> present in DISTRO_FEATURES then the alsa-utils build system will install
> the rules in ${D}/lib/udev/rules.d but do_install will attempt to remove
> ${D}/usr/lib, resulting in something like:
> 
>  rmdir: failed to remove '.../tmp-glibc/work/i586-oe-linux/alsa-utils/1.1.5-r0/image/usr/lib': No such file or directory
> 
> To fix this, let's just tell configure to install the rules in a specific
> known location when udev is disabled. This location can then easily be
> cleaned up in do_install.
> 
> Tested both with and without usrmerge in DISTRO_FEATURES.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mike Crowe <mac at mcrowe.com>
> Cc: Phil Blundell <pb at pbcl.net>
> Cc: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt at axis.com>
> ---
>  meta/recipes-multimedia/alsa/alsa-utils_1.1.5.bb | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Looks good to me.

-- 
Tanu

https://liberapay.com/tanuk
https://www.patreon.com/tanuk