[OE-core] [PATCH] alsa-utils: Fix error when removing unwanted udev rules

[Mike Crowe]

On Wednesday 02 May 2018 at 08:39:27 +0000, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote:
> >  	if ${@bb.utils.contains('PACKAGECONFIG', 'udev', 'false', 'true', d)}; then
> 
> I suggest that you remove the if-statement since the /unwanted directory 
> shall always be removed if it exists so there is no need to test for it.

I had wondered about doing that myself, but had decided to make as few
changes as possible.

> > -		# This is where alsa-utils will install its rules if we don't tell it anything else.
> > -		rm -rf ${D}${nonarch_base_libdir}/udev
> > -		rmdir --ignore-fail-on-non-empty ${D}${nonarch_base_libdir}
> > +        	# If udev is disabled, we told configure to install the rules in /unwanted, so
> > +        	# we can get rid of them now.
> > +        	rm -rf ${D}/unwanted
> 
> Correct the indentation (the rest of the function is indented using
> tabs).

I'd spotted that, and had thought that I'd sorted it out. It turns out that
I ended up making it even worse with a mixture of spaces and tabs. :(

Hopefully v2 is better.

Thanks.

Mike.