[OE-core] [PULL][PATCH 0/2] Implement debian packages GPG signing

Alexander Kanavin alex.kanavin at gmail.com
Tue Apr 2 08:17:18 UTC 2019


Yes, that is fine. Let me know if something is not clear in that test case.

Btw, the apt version we have is badly out of date (and has a significant security issue I think) so if you can update that, that’d be awesome.

Alex

> On 2 Apr 2019, at 9.36, Xavier Berger <xavier.berger at bio-logic.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi Alexender, 
> 
> I'm working on test case but I've a lot of things to understand (and setup to perform).
> I'm basically taking dnf as example and creating a test for apt. Please let me know if you think my strategy is not correct.
> 
> I'll let you know here when it will work.
> 
> Xavier
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin at gmail.com> 
> Sent: lundi 1 avril 2019 16:50
> To: Xavier Berger <xavier.berger at bio-logic.net>
> Cc: OE-core <openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org>
> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PULL][PATCH 0/2] Implement debian packages GPG signing
> 
>> On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 at 15:57, Xavier Berger <xavier.berger at bio-logic.net> wrote:
>> Xavier Berger (2):
>>  gpg-sign: Add parameters to gpg signature function
>>  package_manager: sign DEB package feeds
>> 
>> meta/lib/oe/gpg_sign.py        |  6 +++++-
>> meta/lib/oe/package_manager.py | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
> 
> How do we make sure this does not regress? Can you add a test case similar to one for rpm feed signing?
> 
> Alex


More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list