[OE-core] [PATCH v3] gcc-sanitizers: fix -Werror=maybe-uninitialized issue

Khem Raj raj.khem at gmail.com
Tue Apr 16 18:00:44 UTC 2019


On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 1:40 AM Yu, Mingli <mingli.yu at windriver.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2019年04月16日 00:21, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 07:19:13AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> >>
> >> What are you trying to convey ? That’s what I mentioned before I began my
> >> reply however to reiterate my point was if a package is not usually built
> >> and tested with this combination which is evident because it fails to build
> >> then how good would it be if we fix this error especially complex packages
> >> like compilers so is it worth to fix them or disable Og for them
> >
> > Packages that usually get built and tested with -Og should be pretty rare,
> > and these specific build failures are better at finding the rare packages
> > that use -Werror than pointing at potential miscompilations.
> >
> >>From a distribution point of view, a package build with -Werror by
> > default is arguably a bug since this frequently breaks when something
> > is changed (usually the compiler version).
> >
> > -Og is better suited than the -O that was previously used for debugging,
> > but are we talking about debug builds or production builds?
> > If users would be using DEBUG_OPTIMIZATION in production builds that
>
> Thanks Adrian and Khem's response!
> We indeed don't use DEBUG_OPTIMIZATION in production build.
>
> But still comes question: how to silence gcc-sanitizers build failure
> when debug build enabled?
>
> Thanks,
>
> > would be wrong - this will always be a mostly untested situation
> > with an increased probability of hitting bugs noone else has seen
> > before.

disable warning as errors.

> >
> > cu
> > Adrian
> >


More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list