[OE-core] [PATCH v2] kernel-fitimage: support RISC-V

[Michael Scott]

On 4/23/19 2:37 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-04-19 at 10:41 -0700, Michael Scott wrote:
>> On 4/12/19 9:56 PM, Michael Scott wrote:
>>> Support RISC-V kernel image, using the "Image" target.
>>>
>>> This change allows RISC-V support for fitImage via the following
>>> flow: OpenSBI -> u-boot (as payload) -> Linux kernel (as fitImage
>>> with ramdisk and dtb).
>>>
>>> This was tested using QEMU RISC-V 64-bit.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Scott <mike at foundries.io>
>>> ---
>>>    meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass | 2 +-
>>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass
>>> b/meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass
>>> index 2517d75746..09abedff8e 100644
>>> --- a/meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass
>>> +++ b/meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass
>>> @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ python __anonymous () {
>>>            d.setVar("DEPENDS", depends)
>>>    
>>>            uarch = d.getVar("UBOOT_ARCH")
>>> -        if uarch == "arm64":
>>> +        if uarch == "arm64" or uarch == "riscv":
>> I didn't see any response to this v2 patch.  Is this approach
>> acceptible?  RISC-V should not attempt to use zImage for fitImage as
>> it now stands.
> I think the v1 patch was merged. I'd take a patch to tweak the code to
> the v2 version as it is slightly neater but its not essential.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
Thank you for pointing out that v1 got merged.  I didn't realize there 
isn't a notification for when patches are merged and wasn't watching the 
warrior branches.  I'll submit the tweak patch later this week.

- Mike

>
-- 
Michael Scott
Embedded Software Engineer at Foundries.io
"microPlatforms™ for Connected Products"
E: mike at foundries.io
W: https://www.foundries.io