[OE-core] [PATCH] arch-arm: Do not add -march options for arm architecture

Khem Raj raj.khem at gmail.com
Wed Jan 23 20:05:20 UTC 2019


tune files which inherit the arch definitions already define appropriate
-mcpu option, which is equivalent of right -march and -mtune combination
and is preferred since gcc is getting stricter and stricter with option
check semantics and can now find incompatible -march and -mcpu options
better with every release. It does internal feature consistency check
and if it finds out discrepency between what -mcpu would expand to as
compared to -march it will flag the options to be incompatible, for
naked eye it sounds wrong but gcc would translate -mcpu to a given
-march internally and it might not match to what we set in these arch
files.

The effects are quite subtle, where this can result in configure test
failing to compile due to these incompatible options and a feature
option getting disabled for a recipe for no reason.

e.g. with gcc9 which can now detect that -mcpu=cortex-a5 and
-march=armv7-a are incompatible, many features in libstdc++ ends up
disabled due to configure check failures e.g. size_t size, ptrdiff_t
sizes, which inturn results in compiling libstdc++ with unwanted
disabled features.

Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com>
---
 meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv4.inc   | 1 -
 meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv5.inc   | 1 -
 meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv6.inc   | 1 -
 meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv7a.inc  | 1 -
 meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv7ve.inc | 1 -
 meta/conf/machine/include/tune-iwmmxt.inc      | 2 +-
 6 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv4.inc b/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv4.inc
index 47a7ad2830..52d8ab1e8f 100644
--- a/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv4.inc
+++ b/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv4.inc
@@ -2,7 +2,6 @@ DEFAULTTUNE ?= "armv4"
 
 TUNEVALID[arm] = "Enable ARM instruction set"
 TUNEVALID[armv4] = "Enable instructions for ARMv4"
-TUNE_CCARGS .= "${@bb.utils.contains('TUNE_FEATURES', 'armv4', ' -march=armv4t', '', d)}"
 # enable --fix-v4bx when we have armv4 in TUNE_FEATURES, but then disable it when we have also armv5 or thumb
 # maybe we should extend bb.utils.contains to support check for any checkvalues in value, now it does 
 # checkvalues.issubset(val) which cannot be used for negative test of foo neither bar in value
diff --git a/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv5.inc b/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv5.inc
index f9068af9de..1fe1b6b8e4 100644
--- a/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv5.inc
+++ b/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv5.inc
@@ -2,7 +2,6 @@ DEFAULTTUNE ?= "armv5"
 
 TUNEVALID[armv5] = "Enable instructions for ARMv5"
 TUNECONFLICTS[armv5] = "armv4"
-TUNE_CCARGS .= "${@bb.utils.contains('TUNE_FEATURES', 'armv5', ' -march=armv5t${ARMPKGSFX_DSP}', '', d)}"
 MACHINEOVERRIDES =. "${@bb.utils.contains('TUNE_FEATURES', 'armv5', 'armv5:', '' ,d)}"
 
 require conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv4.inc
diff --git a/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv6.inc b/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv6.inc
index 6c838e999c..adb9be8050 100644
--- a/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv6.inc
+++ b/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv6.inc
@@ -2,7 +2,6 @@ DEFAULTTUNE ?= "armv6hf"
 
 TUNEVALID[armv6] = "Enable instructions for ARMv6"
 TUNECONFLICTS[armv6] = "armv4 armv5"
-TUNE_CCARGS .= "${@bb.utils.contains('TUNE_FEATURES', 'armv6', ' -march=armv6', '', d)}"
 MACHINEOVERRIDES =. "${@bb.utils.contains('TUNE_FEATURES', 'armv6', 'armv6:', '' ,d)}"
 
 require conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv5-dsp.inc
diff --git a/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv7a.inc b/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv7a.inc
index a2663d8008..09d2c03a5d 100644
--- a/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv7a.inc
+++ b/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv7a.inc
@@ -3,7 +3,6 @@ ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET ?= "thumb"
 
 TUNEVALID[armv7a] = "Enable instructions for ARMv7-a"
 TUNECONFLICTS[armv7a] = "armv4 armv5 armv6 armv7"
-TUNE_CCARGS .= "${@bb.utils.contains('TUNE_FEATURES', 'armv7a', ' -march=armv7-a', '', d)}"
 MACHINEOVERRIDES =. "${@bb.utils.contains('TUNE_FEATURES', 'armv7a', 'armv7a:', '' ,d)}"
 
 require conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv6.inc
diff --git a/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv7ve.inc b/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv7ve.inc
index 4d9260fecb..31e334f645 100644
--- a/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv7ve.inc
+++ b/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv7ve.inc
@@ -2,7 +2,6 @@ DEFAULTTUNE ?= "armv7vethf"
 
 TUNEVALID[armv7ve] = "Enable instructions for ARMv7ve"
 TUNECONFLICTS[armv7ve] = "armv4 armv5 armv6 armv7 armv7a"
-TUNE_CCARGS .= "${@bb.utils.contains('TUNE_FEATURES', 'armv7ve', ' -march=armv7ve', '', d)}"
 MACHINEOVERRIDES =. "${@bb.utils.contains('TUNE_FEATURES', 'armv7ve', 'armv7ve:', '' ,d)}"
 
 require conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv7a.inc
diff --git a/meta/conf/machine/include/tune-iwmmxt.inc b/meta/conf/machine/include/tune-iwmmxt.inc
index f27423cb2e..6e577697cc 100644
--- a/meta/conf/machine/include/tune-iwmmxt.inc
+++ b/meta/conf/machine/include/tune-iwmmxt.inc
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ DEFAULTTUNE ?= "iwmmxt"
 require conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv5-dsp.inc
 
 TUNEVALID[iwmmxt] = "Enable Intel PXA27x specific processor optimizations"
-TUNE_CCARGS .= "${@bb.utils.contains('TUNE_FEATURES', 'iwmmxt', ' -march=iwmmxt -mcpu=iwmmxt', '', d)}"
+TUNE_CCARGS .= "${@bb.utils.contains('TUNE_FEATURES', 'iwmmxt', ' -mcpu=iwmmxt', '', d)}"
 
 AVAILTUNES += "iwmmxt"
 ARMPKGARCH_tune-iwmmxt = "iwmmxt"
-- 
2.20.1



More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list