[OE-core] [meta-oe][PATCH v2] openssl: fix multilib file install conflicts

[Xulin Sun]

On 01/27/2019 07:15 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-01-22 at 11:03 +0800, Xulin Sun wrote:
>> To avoid issue like below if run "bitbake lib32-core-image-minimal"
>> with series userspace packages(LAMP,krb5...) added.
>>
>> Add multilib_script support for openssl's c_rehash which is a perl
>> script.
>>
>> Error: Transaction check error:
>>    file /usr/bin/c_rehash conflicts between attempted installs of
>>    lib32-openssl-bin-1.1.1-r0.armv7at2hf_neon and openssl-bin-1.1.1-
>> r0.aarch64
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xulin Sun <xulin.sun at windriver.com>
>> ---
>>   meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl_1.1.1a.bb | 4 ++++
>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl_1.1.1a.bb
>> b/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl_1.1.1a.bb
>> index 5c4e69c..21359fa 100644
>> --- a/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl_1.1.1a.bb
>> +++ b/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl_1.1.1a.bb
>> @@ -206,3 +206,7 @@ RREPLACES_openssl-conf = "openssl10-conf"
>>   RCONFLICTS_openssl-conf = "openssl10-conf"
>>   
>>   BBCLASSEXTEND = "native nativesdk"
>> +
>> +inherit multilib_script
>> +
>> +MULTILIB_SCRIPTS = "${PN}:${bindir}/c_rehash"
> Peter's feedback still needs addressing on whether c_rehash is in ${PN}
> or ${PN}-bin?

c_rehash is in ${PN}-bin.  if no other concerns, v3 will be sent.

Thanks
Xulin
>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
>