[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] util-linux: upgrade to 2.33.2

[ChenQi]

On 06/12/2019 01:43 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 10:06:33AM +0800, Chen Qi wrote:
>> The license files' names are changed, but the contents remain the
>> same.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen at windriver.com>
>> ---
>>   meta/recipes-core/util-linux/util-linux.inc              | 16 ++++++++--------
>>   .../{util-linux_2.32.1.bb => util-linux_2.33.2.bb}       |  4 ++--
>>   2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>   rename meta/recipes-core/util-linux/{util-linux_2.32.1.bb => util-linux_2.33.2.bb} (72%)
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/util-linux/util-linux.inc b/meta/recipes-core/util-linux/util-linux.inc
>> index 7b9b4d2..eaaf408 100644
>> --- a/meta/recipes-core/util-linux/util-linux.inc
>> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/util-linux/util-linux.inc
>> @@ -8,15 +8,15 @@ SECTION = "base"
>>   
>>   LICENSE = "GPLv2+ & LGPLv2.1+ & BSD"
>> ...
>> -                    file://Documentation/licenses/COPYING.UCB;md5=263860f8968d8bafa5392cab74285262 \
>> ...
>> +                    file://Documentation/licenses/COPYING.BSD-4-Clause-UC;md5=263860f8968d8bafa5392cab74285262 \
>> ...
> Doesn't this mean that LICENSE is (and already was before) wrong?
>
> meta/files/common-licenses/BSD is the 3 clause BSD licence,
> but this is the 4 clause licence (with the advertising clause).
>
> cu
> Adrian
>
Thanks. I've changed this in V2.

Best Regards,

Chen Qi