[OE-core] Two recipes providing the same .so... How it should not be done :)

[Ricardo Ribalda Delgado]

Epoch is set to 5, so that should not be the issue

PV = "${L4T_RELEASE}"
PE = "5"

Thanks

On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 10:37 AM Richard Purdie
<richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2019-03-05 at 09:27 +0100, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
> > Hi Richard,
> >
> > Thanks for your reply!
> >
> > I tried with the following:
> >
> > INSANE_SKIP_${PN} = "already-stripped"
> > INSANE_SKIP_libegl-tegra = "ldflags dev-so"
> > INSANE_SKIP_libgles1-tegra = "ldflags dev-so"
> > INSANE_SKIP_libgles2-tegra = "ldflags"
> > INSANE_SKIP_libgl-tegra = "ldflags dev-so textrel"
> >
> > RREPLACES_libgl-tegra = "libgl-mesa"
> > RREPLACES_libegl-tegra = "libegl-mesa"
> > RREPLACES_libgles1-tegra = "libgles1-mesa"
> > RREPLACES_libgles2-tegra = "libgles2-mesa"
> >
> > RCONFLICTS_libgl-tegra = "libgl-mesa"
> > RCONFLICTS_libegl-tegra = "libegl-mesa"
> > RCONFLICTS_libgles1-tegra = "libgles1-mesa"
> > RCONFLICTS_libgles2-tegra = "libgles2-mesa"
> >
> > RPROVIDES_libgl-tegra += "gl-proprietary libgl libgl-mesa"
> > RPROVIDES_libegl-tegra += "libegl libegl-mesa"
> > RPROVIDES_libgles2-tegra += "libgles2 libgles2-tegra"
> > RPROVIDES_libgles1-tegra += "libgles1 libgles1-tegra"
> >
> > But then do_rootfs fails:
> >
> > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> >  mesa-demos : Depends: libegl-mesa (>= 18.3.4+git0+b26488dead) but it
> > is not going to be installed
> >               Depends: libgl-mesa (>= 18.3.4+git0+b26488dead) but it
> > is not going to be installed
> >  qv4l2 : Depends: libgl-mesa (>= 18.3.4+git0+b26488dead) but it is
> > not
> > going to be installed
> >          Depends: qtbase (>= 5.11.1+git0+74305ba470) but it is not
> > going to be installed
> >
> >
> > I am forcing the installation of libgl-tegra by making:
> >
> > XSERVER += "gl-proprietary"
> >
> > What am I doing wrong :)
>
> I'd forgotten that things have hard version requirements in some of
> these dependencies :(
>
> You'd probably need to make sure your recipe has a version (or epoch,
> PE may be easier) higher than the original recipe? I think that is what
> the package manager is saying in the error above.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>


-- 
Ricardo Ribalda