[OE-core] [thud][PATCH] Revert "boost: update to 1.69.0"

[akuster808]

On 3/24/19 11:01 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 07:52:06AM +0000, Mikko.Rapeli at bmw.de wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 06:03:05PM +0100, Andreas Müller wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 5:45 PM Armin Kuster <akuster808 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> This reverts commit a384248938ea9db096866bf4ec8678d35ca62a12.
>>>>
>>>> This package update slipped in doing the maint process. Removing it.
>> <snip>
>>> Just my opinion - don't consider this as NAK.
>>>
>>> * I already fixed the recipes that failed for me. For at least one the
>>> change is no more compatible to 1.68.0.
>>> * This makes PV going backwards
>>>
>>> Thanks for addressing - what do others think?
>> I'm not using thud yet, but updating boost in stable branch would break
>> too many things and I would have to revert that change in our trees. Some boost
>> updates are in the end quite trivial and just require recompiling
>> everything but still, I would prefer that boost is not updated in stable
>> branches unless there is a huge security/stability issue with the old version.
> Agreed.
>
> I care less for PV going backwards nowadays, it's probably less annoying than
> bumping PE first in master and then backporting PE bump to thud.
>
> People with build issues related to boost upgrade probably never
> built whole image to push it as an upgrade to end devices.

So do you agree with the revert?

-a rmin
>
> Cheers,
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20190324/56133119/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20190324/56133119/attachment.sig>