[OE-core] [PATCH] meta: handle UBOOT_CONFIG in image.bbclass

[Ming Liu]

> I wonder if we need to make it warn about missing functionality if
someone is using the old option though?

Agreed, will do that in V2.

//Ming Liu

<richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org> 於 2019年5月16日 週四 下午12:55寫道：

> On Thu, 2019-05-16 at 10:56 +0200, Ming Liu wrote:
> > Hi, Richard:
> >
> > > I'd imagine the code is designed so you'd inherit uboot-config in
> > the machine and this therefore could be made to work as is.
> >
> > Yes, that probably is how the author intended it to be used, but
> > unfortunately, that's not how it's being used in BSP layers, that
> > fact is, in most BSP meta layers, they do not put it into INHERIT,
> > only u-boot recipes are inheriting uboot-config.
> >
> > I am on board there is no need to set IMAGE_FSTYPES in uboot-
> > config.bbclass, maybe we should drop it from UBOOT_CONFIG and it
> > would be like: 'UBOOT_CONFIG = "config,,binary"', there will be a
> > empty item in the middle, so the BSP meta layers would work as usual.
> >
> > Will send a V2 if you agree with this.
>
> I agree, I wonder if we need to make it warn about missing
> functionality if someone is using the old option though?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20190516/2be40364/attachment.html>