[OE-core] [PATCH] file: explicitly disable seccomp
Khem Raj
raj.khem at gmail.com
Fri Oct 18 12:33:22 UTC 2019
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 4:58 PM Ross Burton <ross.burton at intel.com> wrote:
> file will automatically enable seccomp if the seccomp headers are
> available, but
> the build will fail on Opensuse Tumbleweed because the include paths are
> wrong.
>
> Enabling seccomp is a bad idea because it interacts badly with pseudo
> (causing
> build failures), so explicitly and globally disable seccomp.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton at intel.com>
> ---
> meta/recipes-devtools/file/file_5.37.bb | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/file/file_5.37.bb
> b/meta/recipes-devtools/file/file_5.37.bb
> index a840dbc012b..c53a120b840 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/file/file_5.37.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/file/file_5.37.bb
> @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ S = "${WORKDIR}/git"
>
> inherit autotools update-alternatives
>
> +EXTRA_OECONF += "--disable-libseccomp"
> +
On host it makes sense but how about for target recipe ? We do have
libseccomp support
Perhaps it’s best to disable it for native and native sdk alone ?
>
> ALTERNATIVE_${PN} = "file"
> ALTERNATIVE_LINK_NAME[file] = "${bindir}/file"
>
> --
> 2.20.1
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20191018/e5c89937/attachment.html>
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list