[OE-core] [PATCH] cve-check: ensure all known CVEs are in the report

[Ross Burton]

CVEs that are whitelisted or were not vulnerable when there are version
comparisons were not included in the report, so alter the logic to ensure that
all relevant CVEs are in the report for completeness.

Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton at intel.com>
---
 meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass | 9 +++++++--
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass b/meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass
index c00d2910be1..f87bcc9dc61 100644
--- a/meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass
@@ -208,12 +208,14 @@ def check_cves(d, patched_cves):
 
             if cve in cve_whitelist:
                 bb.note("%s-%s has been whitelisted for %s" % (product, pv, cve))
+                # TODO: this should be in the report as 'whitelisted'
+                patched_cves.add(cve)
             elif cve in patched_cves:
                 bb.note("%s has been patched" % (cve))
             else:
                 to_append = False
                 if (operator_start == '=' and pv == version_start):
-                    cves_unpatched.append(cve)
+                    to_append = True
                 else:
                     if operator_start:
                         try:
@@ -243,8 +245,11 @@ def check_cves(d, patched_cves):
                         to_append = to_append_start or to_append_end
 
                 if to_append:
+                    bb.note("%s-%s is vulnerable to %s" % (product, pv, cve))
                     cves_unpatched.append(cve)
-                bb.debug(2, "%s-%s is not patched for %s" % (product, pv, cve))
+                else:
+                    bb.note("%s-%s is not vulnerable to %s" % (product, pv, cve))
+                    patched_cves.add(cve)
     conn.close()
 
     return (list(patched_cves), cves_unpatched)
-- 
2.20.1