[OE-core] [PATCH V2] dnf, libdnf: Ignore if PACKAGE_CLASSES does not have rpm

[Alexander Kanavin]

But you do not need to fix or touch dnf at all. You only need to adjust rpm
packaging and split it in two parts instead of bundling everything into a
single package.

Alex

On Wed 12. Feb 2020 at 23.16, Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 2:00 PM Alexander Kanavin
> <alex.kanavin at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I would still prefer to just split rpm packaging into binaries and
> libraries, and avoid the need to blacklist and tweak recipes based on what
> PACKAGE_CLASSES is set to altogether. That setting should not leak into
> recipes, and should only matter from do_package onwards. Can you look into
> the rpm recipe please?
> >
>
>  dnf and dnf related packages expecting rpmdb support in libresolv. I
> do not know dnf well enough to fix it and moreover it has no direct
> use for my usecase either. I also don't see a point of entertaining
> dnf for non-rpm backends. Its not intended for that either even if we
> were to make dnf not want rpmdb what good will it do to build for
> distros who do not use rpm. These changes do not change poky defaults
> which use rpm as default. OE-core does not and I dont know of any
> opkg user who also has rpmdb needed.
>
> > Alex
> >
> > On Wed, 12 Feb 2020 at 20:19, Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> dnf does not work with opkg or dpkg/apt anyway
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >> v2: Use PNBLACKLIST instead of anon python
> >>
> >>  meta/recipes-devtools/dnf/dnf_4.2.2.bb        | 2 ++
> >>  meta/recipes-devtools/libdnf/libdnf_0.28.1.bb | 1 +
> >>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/dnf/dnf_4.2.2.bb
> b/meta/recipes-devtools/dnf/dnf_4.2.2.bb
> >> index f38167f1ad..220f1aabbd 100644
> >> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/dnf/dnf_4.2.2.bb
> >> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/dnf/dnf_4.2.2.bb
> >> @@ -84,3 +84,5 @@ SYSTEMD_SERVICE_${PN} = "dnf-makecache.service
> dnf-makecache.timer \
> >>                           dnf-automatic-notifyonly.service
> dnf-automatic-notifyonly.timer \
> >>  "
> >>  SYSTEMD_AUTO_ENABLE ?= "disable"
> >> +
> >> +PNBLACKLIST[dnf] ?= "${@bb.utils.contains('PACKAGE_CLASSES',
> 'package_rpm', '', 'does not build correctly without package_rpm in
> PACKAGE_CLASSES', d)}"
> >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/libdnf/libdnf_0.28.1.bb
> b/meta/recipes-devtools/libdnf/libdnf_0.28.1.bb
> >> index 882c435b32..49afa04812 100644
> >> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/libdnf/libdnf_0.28.1.bb
> >> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/libdnf/libdnf_0.28.1.bb
> >> @@ -26,4 +26,5 @@ EXTRA_OECMAKE_append_class-native = " -DWITH_GIR=OFF"
> >>  EXTRA_OECMAKE_append_class-nativesdk = " -DWITH_GIR=OFF"
> >>
> >>  BBCLASSEXTEND = "native nativesdk"
> >> +PNBLACKLIST[libdnf] ?= "${@bb.utils.contains('PACKAGE_CLASSES',
> 'package_rpm', '', 'does not build correctly without package_rpm in
> PACKAGE_CLASSES', d)}"
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.25.0
> >>
> >> --
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Openembedded-core mailing list
> >> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> >> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20200213/5f557fa2/attachment.html>