[OE-core] busybox: udhcpc: fix IPv6 support when using udhcpc
quentin.schulz at streamunlimited.com
Tue Jan 21 09:23:41 UTC 2020
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 11:26:27AM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> > Just checked, we still override that script in our layer, so definitely
> > would be happy if this gets merged upstream so I can get rid of our
> > custom script downstream.
> I think this is good to go got OE-core, but I was wondering if default
> script in busybox also need this and perhaps upstream too
What do you mean by "default script"?
Upstream could benefit from it, I'd agree. Though, it is technically
just provided as an example.
The reason why I didn't bother to send a patch to busybox before pinging
on this patch was that we're already different from the upstream simple.script
so it didn't make sense to me to add the Upstream-Status: pending or
something on the patch (in some ways, since it's patching the file
directly and not adding a patch in SRC_URI). Anyway, digressing. Do you
want a patch to be sent to busybox ML (or PR or whatever they use)
before taking this patch?
More information about the Openembedded-core