<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2011/6/9 Mark Hatle <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mark.hatle@windriver.com">mark.hatle@windriver.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
On 6/9/11 5:57 AM, Kang Kai wrote:<br>
> Hi Mark,<br>
><br>
> I am focus on eglibc itself compilation with disabling all the<br>
> configurable options, right now eglibc can be compiled with disable all<br>
> the configurable options.<br>
><br>
> But when I build core-image-minimal in a clear new directory, some<br>
> packages build failed and they need eglibc supports, such as<br>
<br>
core-image-minimal is simply to large of an image to see some of the advantages<br>
of the eglibc configuration. Realistically the advantages come on single<br>
application or small (busybox + single application) systems.<br></blockquote></div><br>Then again if you are in that usecase you're probably better off (spacewise) using static linking<br><br>Frans<br>