<div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 22:00, Richard Purdie <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org">richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">... </div></blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="im">Looking at vesa.c, there is quite a chunk of code in there depending on</div>
DGA.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yes.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Is there any harm to building DGA apart from an extra package? Its a<br>
self contained module isn't it?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>AFAIK no. It seems to be a blob static linked onto the Xorg.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
...</blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">Of course the ideal solution would be for someone to convert the vesa<br>
driver to use the xrandr API...<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Well, yes. But I cannot work on that now.</div><div><br></div><div>In meanwhile I sent another patch proposing to disable it for lite flavor only, as it was before the update to 1.11 Xorg Xserver.</div>
<div> </div></div>-- <br>Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems<br>E-mail: <a href="mailto:otavio@ossystems.com.br" target="_blank">otavio@ossystems.com.br</a> <a href="http://www.ossystems.com.br" target="_blank">http://www.ossystems.com.br</a><br>
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 <a href="http://projetos.ossystems.com.br" target="_blank">http://projetos.ossystems.com.br</a><br><br>