<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 16:20, Joshua Lock <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:josh@linux.intel.com">josh@linux.intel.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">On 16/12/11 14:21, Saul Wold wrote:<br>
><br>
> Does anyone know why we might be keeping this older version around? I<br>
> know that in the past there were kernel <-> udev issues. Are most usages<br>
> now using current kernels and udev?<br>
<br>
</div>I was wondering the same thing. I have a WIP patch series to drop the<br>
old version and the old inc file.<br>
<br>
Further I'd like to try and get meta-oe using at least most of the<br>
oe-core udev, I've not looked at the differences there yet.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I read this e-mail after I started working on this. My current WIP patchset is at:</div><div><br></div><div><a href="https://github.com/OSSystems/oe-core/compare/ae4118a1f78f113c3d687c3aa6a86007cf977cae...master">https://github.com/OSSystems/oe-core/compare/ae4118a1f78f113c3d687c3aa6a86007cf977cae...master</a></div>
<div><br></div><div>I am going to finish this getting 175 on oe-core but those patches seems good for merging to me.</div><div><br></div></div>-- <br>Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems<br>E-mail: <a href="mailto:otavio@ossystems.com.br" target="_blank">otavio@ossystems.com.br</a> <a href="http://www.ossystems.com.br" target="_blank">http://www.ossystems.com.br</a><br>
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 <a href="http://projetos.ossystems.com.br" target="_blank">http://projetos.ossystems.com.br</a><br><br>