<br><br>On Wednesday, May 30, 2012, Burton, Ross wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On 30 May 2012 03:59, Khem Raj <<a href="javascript:;" onclick="_e(event, 'cvml', 'raj.khem@gmail.com')">raj.khem@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Ross Burton <<a href="javascript:;" onclick="_e(event, 'cvml', 'ross.burton@intel.com')">ross.burton@intel.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> -Signed-off-by: Dongxiao Xu <<a href="javascript:;" onclick="_e(event, 'cvml', 'dongxiao.xu@intel.com')">dongxiao.xu@intel.com</a>><br>
>> +Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <<a href="javascript:;" onclick="_e(event, 'cvml', 'ross.burton@intel.com')">ross.burton@intel.com</a>><br>
><br>
> why remove the old sign-off ?<br>
<br>
The patches are semantically different - Dongxiao's solution was to<br>
copy the root rules, my solution is to copy the at_console rules. He<br>
didn't sign off my solution, so I removed his sign-off.<br>
<br></blockquote><div>You could have created a new patch and deleted the old then for clarity</div><div> <span></span></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Ross<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Openembedded-core mailing list<br>
<a href="javascript:;" onclick="_e(event, 'cvml', 'Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org')">Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core" target="_blank">http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core</a><br>
</blockquote>