<div>because the current distribution I manage (not oe based) is rpm based so in my intention I want to furnish (for a while) both installtion methods: via oe build system and via rpm (chrooted or similar).</div><div>And to do the second I need to have the possibility to access to the dbpath oe build system manages during image cretion/installation.</div>
<div>Adding "package-management" to IMAGE_FEATURES I'll have this available. But it includes also target rpm build (honestly I don't need it) that is failing.</div><div> </div><div>Have new suggestions?</div>
<div>Many thanks,</div><div>Giuseppe<br><br></div><div class="gmail_quote">2012/5/31 Gary Thomas <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gary@mlbassoc.com" target="_blank">gary@mlbassoc.com</a>></span><br><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid" class="gmail_quote">
<div class="im">On 2012-05-31 07:57, Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:<br>
<blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid" class="gmail_quote">
Thanks for the reply,<br>
unfortunately I depend from rpm, I need just rpm packages.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
Why do you need RPM?<br>
<br>
<blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid" class="gmail_quote"><div class="im">
So can you confirm the target rpm for uclibc is not building?<br>
Thanks again,<br>
Giuseppe<br>
<br></div>
2012/5/31 Khem Raj <<a href="mailto:raj.khem@gmail.com" target="_blank">raj.khem@gmail.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:raj.khem@gmail.com" target="_blank">raj.khem@gmail.com</a>>><div class="im"><br>
<br>
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 5:35 AM, Giuseppe Condorelli<br></div><div class="im">
<<a href="mailto:giuseppe.condorelli@gmail.com" target="_blank">giuseppe.condorelli@gmail.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:giuseppe.condorelli@gmail.com" target="_blank">giuseppe.condorelli@<u></u>gmail.com</a>>> wrote:<br>
> Is there some difference for uclibc? Please let me know.<br>
<br>
opkg works well with uclibc based systems. Those functions are not<br>
implemented in uclibc I am sure it can be fixed<br>
by linking in other libs or may be creating one. However if you are<br>
not bound to rpm then I would suggest to use opkg<br>
<br>
in your local.conf set it<br>
<br>
PACKAGE_CLASSES = "package_ipk"<br>
</div></blockquote><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
<br>
-- <br>
------------------------------<u></u>------------------------------<br>
Gary Thomas | Consulting for the<br>
MLB Associates | Embedded world<br>
------------------------------<u></u>------------------------------</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
Openembedded-core mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org" target="_blank">Openembedded-core@lists.<u></u>openembedded.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core" target="_blank">http://lists.linuxtogo.org/<u></u>cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/<u></u>openembedded-core</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>