<<bump>><div>Added poky and oe-core.</div><div><br></div><div>anyone?<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Jegan Chandru <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pcjegan@gmail.com" target="_blank">pcjegan@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi,<div><br></div><div>Framework - poky-denzil-7.0</div><div>arch - x86_64</div><div><br></div><div>Is there anyway to get patched source tar file for gcc while building srpm? I have checked the srpms created and found gcc srpms has only the logs_with_scripts tar file and not the patched source. I have configured "archive-patched-source" in local.conf. Upon checking on archiver.bbclass, noticed "not_tarball" function is excluding work-shared dir.This dir is used by gcc only for building. I can see the obvious reason here that(correct me if I am wrong) since this source has been used by, say gcc-cross-intermediate, gcc-cross-4.6.3 and gcc-runtime-4.6.3 bb files and you dont want to archive that source. But anyone can tell me the exact reason on why work-shared is being omitted for archiving? Also, I must include that, there are total 40 patches for gcc and all patches getting applied in gcc-4.6.inc. So I think there is no harm in archiving that source.</div>
<div><br></div><div>As a try and error, I have created a dummy function for not_tarball and tried to build, but that didnt work! ;(</div><div><br></div><div>So please anyone shed some light on this matter. It is much appreciated.</div>
<div>I need srpm with source for stabilizing and do some testing.</div><div><br></div><div>Also there is a high chance that I missed something, so feel free to correct me. ;)</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div>-JC</div>
<div><div><br></div></div></blockquote></div>
</div>