<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Richard Purdie <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org" target="_blank">richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 20:32 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:<br>
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Ross Burton <<a href="mailto:ross.burton@intel.com">ross.burton@intel.com</a>><br>
> wrote:<br>
> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <<a href="mailto:ross.burton@intel.com">ross.burton@intel.com</a>><br>
<br>
><br>
> Please bump PR. Even it might not change the end result we need to<br>
> force a rebuild as we did change the meta-data and we risk having a<br>
> subtle bug somewhere.<br>
<br>
</div>This patch set adds a number of exports to autotools.bbclass. In doing<br>
so, the sstate checksums will change for pretty much everything and<br>
hence pretty much everything will rebuild. Using PR specifically to<br>
force a rebuild is therefore unnecessary.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>If it rebuilds it might get a different binary package and for preserve the upgrade path PR bumps are need, aren't they?</div><div> </div>
</div>-- <br>Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems<br>E-mail: <a href="mailto:otavio@ossystems.com.br" target="_blank">otavio@ossystems.com.br</a> <a href="http://www.ossystems.com.br" target="_blank">http://www.ossystems.com.br</a><br>
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 <a href="http://projetos.ossystems.com.br" target="_blank">http://projetos.ossystems.com.br</a><br><br>