<br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Richard Purdie <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org" target="_blank">richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 17:10 +0100, David Nyström wrote:<br>
> Hello everyone,<br>
><br>
> I'm working on getting a minimal Yocto/oe-core based OpenStack setup<br>
> running with the meta-cloud layer, with bits and pieces "borrowed" from<br>
> the meta-xen layer.<br>
<br>
</div>Great news!<br>
<br>
It might be worth growing meta-xen into a meta-virtualisation layer<br>
since kvm, openstack and xen all seem to be sharing a lot of pieces.<br>
This depends on the maintainers but it would seem to be logical rather<br>
than many small interdependent layers.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>FWIW. I'd like to see this as well, and can contribute/help where possible. I</div><div>was considering a meta-ovs (Open Virtualization Solutions), but if there are</div>
<div>already plans afoot for a meta-virtualization, then anything I did could be</div><div>pushed down keeping any other layers small.</div><div><br></div><div>In particular I'm keen to drive some common kernel configuration, and work</div>
<div>on consolidating kernel features in trees versus having a whole set of out of</div><div>tree modules with better tie in's to userspace enabling features dynamically.</div><div><br></div><div>So I'll keep an eye out for things as well and help where possible.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div><br></div><div>Bruce</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im"><br>
> Still in its infancy, and lots of stuff is still missing and/or not<br>
> working properly.<br>
><br>
> Have a look if your interested, not much to see yet though.<br>
><br>
> <a href="https://github.com/nysan/meta-cloud.git" target="_blank">https://github.com/nysan/meta-cloud.git</a><br>
><br>
> Any thoughts on floating layer ML:s, i.e. an ML for so called<br>
> "out-of-tree" layers ? Or is the common thought that all new recipes<br>
> should eventually go into oe-core ?<br>
<br>
</div>The Yocto Project has been using the Yocto list for that and<br>
OpenEmbedded has openembedded-devel. Its not expected for everything to<br>
end up in OE-Core, quite the opposite.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
<br>
Richard<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Openembedded-core mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org">Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core" target="_blank">http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>"Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end"<br>
</div>