<div dir="ltr">Can you please add ALLOW_EMPTY to sanity check like R* variables are now?</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Richard Purdie <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org" target="_blank">richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 09:10 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:<br>
> just trying to clarify the gory details of the ALLOW_EMPTY setting.<br>
> first, across several .bb files, there is a mixture of these two:<br>
><br>
> ALLOW_EMPTY = "1"<br>
> ALLOW_EMPTY_${PN} = "1"<br>
><br>
> what's the difference? what does the first one represent if you're<br>
> not specific? does that cover *all* generated packages?<br>
<br>
FWIW, a package name should generally be specified. I've just sent a<br>
patch to OE-Core updating the various references.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
<br>
Richard<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Openembedded-core mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org">Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core" target="_blank">http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>